יום שני, 29 בפברואר 2016

Hypocrisy at its Best - June 19th 2005

Hypocrisy at its Best

Last week, the international Court of Justice in The Hague condemned Israel for the Wall it built to protect its citizens from suicide bombers infiltrating into Israel from the West Bank.

Does any legal mind in the civilized society believe that someone who acted as a lawyer for a party can judge between that party and its adversary? Well, the International Court of Justice does think so. Judge Nabil Elaraby headed the Egyptian delegation to the Taba negotiations with Israel, after being the agent of the Egyptian government to the Egyptian – Israeli arbitration tribunal [the taba dispute]. Egypt was also a party to the proceedings in The Hague. So judge Elaraby who acted for one party [Egypt] against another party [Israel], serves today as the judge between these two parties [Egypt and Israel]. Israel’s motion to disqualify the honorable judge was dismissed.


Security Fence Near Jerusalem


The Honorable court had to have “facts finding”. This was provided, not objectively, but by dossiers prepared including “several reports based on site visits by special rapporteurs competent organs of the UN”. Indeed, the reports were so “objective” it enabled the court a detailed account of the sufferings of the Palestinians. Oh yes? The bombing? The 900 dead in the streets of Israel? The hospitals full of life crippled people? The damage to property within Israel? No. Not a single “fact finding” about why the wall was built.

The honorable court then summarized the historical facts. The UN resolution 181(II) known as the plan of partition of Palestine to two independent states. “The Arab States – the court’s decision summarizes” rejected this plan, contemding that it was unbalanced. Or was it because the Arab States simply refused to recognize any Jewish state in the area? But the court’s decision has to retain its objectivity, and so the total refusal to have any Jewish state in the area was worded by the honorable court as an issue of ‘’unbalanced division’’.


Zalli Jaffe

אין תגובות:

הוסף רשומת תגובה